By President Donald Trump’s nomination of South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem to his cabinet advanced hours after the commander and chief’s inauguration on Monday, Jan. 20
The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs voted 13-2 in support of the president’s longtime ally assuming the role of secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, setting up a vote on her nomination on the Senate floor later this week.
The vote was one of the first actions the Senate took following Trump’s swearing in ceremony. The president becomes only the second in U.S. history to serve two non-consecutive terms.
The vote also came just a three days after Noem had her nomination hearing in front of the committee. By and large a non-confrontational proceeding, the South Dakota governor faced questions from Democrats, although they did not appear to be aimed at derailing her nomination.
Noem breezed through her Senate confirmation hearing Friday, Jan. 17, vowing to follow the laws created by Congress and to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
She also vowed to help Trump make a 180-degree turn on the last four years of border policy.
Noem’s hearing was largely an exercise in bipartisanship, with both Democratic and Republican committee members expressing the need for both political parties to work together to keep the U.S. safe. That tone was set by the ranking Democratic member on the committee, Michigan Sen. Gary Peters.
“Let’s move away from this toxic political environment that we have in the country and celebrate what’s great about our county in the spirit of brining the American people together,” he said.
“It’s a non-partisan role,” agreed Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Lankford. “It is a national security role.”
The hearing was a departure from some of the more confrontational hearings the week of Jan. 13 for Trump’s nominees, including those of defense secretary and attorney general.
Peters was joined by his fellow northern border state Sen. Margaret Hassan, D-N.H., to express concern about that border. While the focus of illegal immigration and national security threats have been on the border with Mexico, they said the northern border was also a concern.
MORE: Hundreds crowd Sioux Falls hearing on second attempt at a carbon pipeline permit
Noem pledged to work to secure the resources necessary to expand personnel and technology on the border — Hassan said remote parts of the border don’t have cell service — noting that the northern border has geographic challenges that the southern border doesn’t have.
Hassan questioned why Noem had turned down federal cybersecurity grants through a program she had sponsored. The program had allocated $1 billion for states over four years to apply for grants to help upgrade local government cybersecurity networks. Hassan said she was a sponsor of the program, and she asked why South Dakota was one of only two states to turn down the grants.
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem breezed through her Senate confirmation hearing Friday, Jan. 17 in Washington D.C. Courtesy photo.
Noem responded that the grants included requirements that she expand state government and resources to accept them, which she declined to do. She also cited South Dakota’s in-house cybersecurity resources.
Hassan said she had created the program to be streamlined and non-burdensome to states, but she said she looked forward to having a future conversation with Noem about why the South Dakota governor thought there were requirements placed on states.
The exchange was polite, and about as confrontational as Noem faced over the course of two and a half hours of questioning.
Cybersecurity — one of the areas overseen by Homeland Security — came up repeatedly during the hearing, and Noem talked about various Chinese-led hacking attacks. She mentioned the state’s expertise in the area with Dakota State University, noting the Madison, South Dakota, school had trained employees hired by the National Security Agency.
MORE: One tribe lifts Noem’s banishment ahead of Homeland Security confirmation hearing
But other areas of Homeland Security were not touched on — with Noem expressing surprise near the end of her hearing that more questions hadn’t been addressed about the Transportation Security Administration.
The dominant subject was on border security. Arizona Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego wanted assurances that Homeland Security would continue to assist small border communities with assistance. Those communities, he said, bear the brunt of immigration and often have scant resources, with just a few law enforcement officers. Gallego said Arizona border communities used Homeland Security resources in the right way, unlike other places, like, for example, New York state.
Gallego also expressed concern that a draconian deportation policy would have negative effects on the food industry, driving up inflation if labor was deported. He noted that South Dakota has an agricultural industry that might be affected.
Noem said the priority of the incoming administration is to deport about 425,000 immigrants with known criminal convictions, including murderers and rapists.
“That will be a focus we need to tackle right away,” she said. The next focus, she added, would be on the population of immigrants with existing deportation orders.
New Jersey Democratic Sen. Andy Kim questioned whether Noem would be truly in control of border policy. He referred to public comments made by Trump saying incoming Border Czar Tom Homan would be in charge. That, he said, would be an intrusion on the duties of the Homeland Security secretary.
“I want to make sure we are empowering the next secretary of Homeland Security. . . I just raise that as a concern of mine,” Kim said.
Homan has endorsed Noem to be the next secretary, and Noem said, “Tom and I work very well together.” In the end, she said Trump would be in charge of border policy.
Democrats also wanted assurances that Noem would distribute disaster assistance dollars without regard to political bias, which she said she would do. The specter of the California wildfires that destroyed thousands of homes in Los Angeles was brought up several times Friday. Some Republicans have suggested that assistance dollars shouldn’t come without conditions — they blame California’s leadership for failing to take precautions and preparing for the wildfires.
Noem told Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, who worried that unfettered disaster assistance created “moral hazard,” that she wished California had better local leadership and that if it had better local leadership, the response to the fires would have been different.
The Department of Homeland Security is a creature of the post 9/11 terrorist attacks, when the federal government moved to house several distinct agencies under the roof of one department. The reasoning behind its creation was to streamline communication among the agencies — lack of communication was a pitfall to uncovering the 9/11 attacks before they occurred.